Thanks fro all the answers - I'll just drop the secondary MX. Regards Greybear
2009/12/18 Andrew Porter <[email protected]> > Greybear wrote: > > > > I have a setup that contains an exchange 2003, an ASSP box in front of it > > and a secondary mailserver at our ISP. > > Unless you are going to expect significant lengthy down time I don't > bother with a secondary at all. All servers should be storing and > forwarding so any attempts to deliver that fail with a non-final failure > might as well sit on the sender's server waiting. > > It's never caused me a problem this way - although I rarely have email > downtime anyway. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support > A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and > easy > Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
