Hello
I published this query a couple of months ago and it's still plaguing me - I wonder if anyone could help please. We moved from ASSP v1 to ASSP v2 a few months back, and have noticed a difference in the way the 'Received' headers are written when using 'Transparent' Helo mode. Both v1 and v2 are the very latest versions as of today. Our routing inbound is Internet >> ASSP >> hMailserver, then onto some internally written indexing and archiving system to store the messages, then into Exchange. In the past we've used the headers to identify the Internet-based sending server - this information is available in the second received header in the ASSP v1 example below. This data is stored in our index for email trail purposes. When moving to ASSP v2, we noticed the second set of Received headers was missing, and therefore we can't then get a fix on the sending server. Below are the headers from the .eml files out the back of hMailserver from the same controlled test using both ASSP1 and ASSP2. As you'll see there are one set of 'Received' headers missing in v2, and this importantly is the 'Received' header containing the IP address of the sending server (or PC in this test): ------- ASSP v1 ------- Return-Path: < <mailto:t...@mipost.co.uk> t...@mipost.co.uk> Received: from MYPC ([77.36.34.151]) by inbound104.mstream.com with hMailServer ; Thu, 21 Apr 2013 14:31:02 +0100 Received: from MYPC ([77.36.34.43] helo=MYPC) by -------- MISSING IN ASSP V2 --------- Filter-Layer with ESMTP (ASSP 1.98); 18 Apr 2013 14:31:02 +0100 From: "test account" < <mailto:t...@mipost.co.uk> t...@mipost.co.uk> To: < <mailto:t...@mipost.co.uk> t...@mipost.co.uk> Subject: test - ASSP v1 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:31:02 +0100 Message-ID: < <mailto:002901ce3c38$f8b4d9c0$ea1e8d40$@mipost.co.uk> 002901ce3c38$f8b4d9c0$ea1e8d40$@mipost.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; ______________________________________________ Giacom email security by www.messagestream.com boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002A_01CE3C41.5A798FE0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: Ac48OPLpmi5vZXPaS2OS4laGaN+UMw== Content-Language: en-gb ------- ASSP v2 ------- Return-Path: < <mailto:t...@mipost.co.uk> t...@mipost.co.uk> Received: from MYPC ([77.36.34.151]) by inbound104.mstream.com with hMailServer ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:24:30 +0100 From: "test account" < <mailto:t...@mipost.co.uk> t...@mipost.co.uk> To: < <mailto:t...@mipost.co.uk> t...@mipost.co.uk> Subject: test - ASSPv2 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:24:30 +0100 Message-ID: < <mailto:002001ce3c38$0f0a4710$2d1ed530$@mipost.co.uk> 002001ce3c38$0f0a4710$2d1ed530$@mipost.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0021_01CE3C40.70CEFD30" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: Ac48OA5a+QSdOINXR9KJ6J/h/JaZ+A== Content-Language: en-gb ------ I know Perl reasonably well, and have been trying to understand where the differences might be, but I'm at the end of my ability. I wondered if anyone would kindly help identify if there's anything I can do to fix it. Many thanks Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
