Here are two. There have been others, but we do a lot of business with this 
company so this is one I easily remember. I can get more if that would help.

Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> info: found message size announcement: 19.07 
kByte
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] [UnknownLocalSender] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> [scoring] (Invalid Local Sender 
'[email protected]')
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> Message-Score: added 20 (flValencePB) for 
InvalidLocalSender, total score for this message is now 20
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> PB-IP-Score for '173.160.199.113' is 20, 
added 20 for InvalidLocalSender
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] [Noprocessing] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] info: found valid 
MSGID signature in [In-Reply-To:] - accept mail
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-ID found: 
E9BF03AF02EC99458623BCBAD7395EC8483A5CE7@glaze.PacificLightingSystems.local
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring] SPF: 
permerror ip=173.160.199.113 [email protected] 
helo=glaze.pacificlightingsystems.com
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score: added 
40 (spfeValencePB)for SPF permerror, total score for this message is now 60
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] [MessageLimit] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [spam found] 
(MessageScore 60, limit 45) [RE Amazon Controls mock up] -> 
c:/assp/discarded/3566--929914.eml;
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [SMTP Error] 554 
5.7.1 Mail appears to be unsolicited -- send error reports to 
[email protected]


Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> info: found message size announcement: 9.19 
kByte
Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] [UnknownLocalSender] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> [scoring] (Invalid Local Sender 
'[email protected]')
Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> Message-Score: added 20 (flValencePB) for 
InvalidLocalSender, total score for this message is now 20
Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] [Noprocessing] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] info: found valid 
MSGID signature in [References:] - accept mail
Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-ID found: 
6C9BBD35E9796F45B1D52894183874A547903C6E@glaze.PacificLightingSystems.local
Sep-17-14 09:23:48 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring] SPF: 
permerror ip=173.160.199.113 [email protected] 
helo=glaze.pacificlightingsystems.com
Sep-17-14 09:23:48 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score: added 
40 (spfeValencePB) for SPF permerror, total score for this message is now 60
Sep-17-14 09:23:48 71027-06894 [Worker_4] [MessageLimit] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [spam found] 
(MessageScore 60, limit 45) [RE Cooper Monaco Fixture Warranty] -> 
c:/assp/discarded/6894--929669.eml;
Sep-17-14 09:23:48 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [SMTP Error] 554 
5.7.1 Mail appears to be unsolicited -- send error reports to 
[email protected]

...Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 12:07 AM
To: For Users of ASSP
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF Failures

>I'm seeing a lot of SPF failures recently,

show the loglines

Thomas





Von:    Tim Evans <[email protected]>
An:     "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Datum:  18.09.2014 21:24
Betreff:        [Assp-user] SPF Failures



I'm seeing a lot of SPF failures recently, and investigating the details I 
find some are incorrect - the email comes from a valid system listed in 
the SPF record. Has anyone else seen anything like this or have any ideas 
what the problem may be?

I'm running assp 2.4.3(14258) on perl v5.16.3 and Windows Server 
2008R2SP1. I've got Mail::SPF v2.007 and Mail::SPF::Query v1.999001, which 
both look like the current recommended modules.

...Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user





DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to