I got the same error for hotmail.com DKIM signatures.
hotmail.com _domainkey selector 1 is :
"v=DKIM1;k=rsa;p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAvWyktrIL8DO/+UGvMbv7cPd/Xogpbs7pgVw8y9ldO6AAMmg8+ij
ENl/c7Fb1MfKM7uG3LMwAr0dVVKyM+mbkoX2k5L7lsROQr0Z9gGSpu7xrnZOa58+/pIhd2Xk/DFPpa5+TKbWodbsSZPRN8z0RY5x59jdzSclXlEyN9mEZdmO
iKTsOP6A7vQxfSya9jg5"
"N81dfNNvP7HnWejMMsKyIMrXptxOhIBuEYH67JDe98QgX14oHvGM2Uz53if/SW8MF09rYh9sp4ZsaWLIg6T343JzlbtrsGRGCDJ9JPpxRWZimtz
+Up/BlKzT6sCCrBihb/Bi3pZiEBB4Ui/vruL5RCQIDAQAB;n=2048,1452627113,1468351913"
For what ever reason, Mail::DKIM is unable to fetch() the public key.
There is nothing you can do.
Thomas
Von: "Andy Knuts" <[email protected]>
An: "For Users of ASSP" <[email protected]>
Datum: 20.07.2016 00:35
Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
It looks like there's a problem with DNS in general but it's not always a
problem:
# grep DKIM 16-07-19.maillog.txt|grep @hotmail|grep 'public key: not
available'
Jul-19-16 00:21:04 m1-80462-07675 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.91
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring] (DKIM signature
invalid) - public key: not available
Jul-19-16 08:47:43 m1-10862-06664 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.87
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring] (DKIM
signature invalid) - public key: not available
Jul-19-16 08:59:43 m1-11582-08285 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.215
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring] (DKIM
signature invalid) - public key: not available
Jul-19-16 09:45:13 m1-14312-02896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.116.39
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring] (DKIM signature
invalid) - public key: not available
Jul-19-16 12:39:49 m1-24788-06927 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.51.96
<[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring] (DKIM signature
invalid) - public key: not available
Jul-19-16 15:58:58 m1-36736-07796 [Worker_5] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.90
<[email protected]> to: [email protected]
[scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available
Jul-19-16 17:16:33 m1-41391-04219 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.80
<[email protected]> to: [email protected]
[scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available
Jul-19-16 19:47:03 m1-50422-00530 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.35
<[email protected]> to:[email protected] [scoring] (DKIM signature
invalid) - public key: not available
The DNS servers also seem to work fine for every other services but as
you can see, sometimes ASSP is unable to find the public key for
hotmail.com ?
I'm using Net::DNS 1.06. This version is okay, right?
Regards
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Knuts [mailto:[email protected]]
To:
For Users of ASSP [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wed, 20 Jul
2016 00:13:16 +0100
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> I upgraded to Mail:SPF 2.9.0 as suggested but there's still an issue:
>
> # grep '(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror' 16-07-19.maillog.txt | wc -l
> 444
>
> # grep hotmail.com 16-07-19.maillog.txt |grep -i "for SPF pass" | wc -l
> 258
>
>
> # grep '(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror' 16-07-19.maillog.txt |grep -i
> hotmail
> Jul-19-16 07:45:11 m1-07110-04028 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.99
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score: added 5
> (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 5
> Jul-19-16 12:37:51 m1-24670-10746 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.55.90.169
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected]
> Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score
for
> this message is now -6
> Jul-19-16 12:39:49 m1-24788-06927 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.51.96
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score: added 5
> (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now
-6
> Jul-19-16 12:51:11 m1-25471-04061 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.1.140
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score:
added 5
> (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now
10
> Jul-19-16 14:08:49 m1-30128-13259 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.90
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score: added 5
> (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 7
> Jul-19-16 17:15:12 m1-41310-11578 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.90.39
> <[email protected]> to:
[email protected]
> Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score
for
> this message is now -6
> Jul-19-16 17:16:33 m1-41391-04219 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.80
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected]
> Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score
for
> this message is now -8
> Jul-19-16 19:36:37 m1-49796-00753 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.2.37
> <[email protected]> to:
[email protected]
> Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score
for
> this message is now -6
> Jul-19-16 19:39:01 m1-49940-06640 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.2.26
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score: added 5
> (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 9
> Jul-19-16 20:15:13 m1-52113-02738 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.1.160
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score: added 5
> (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now
-6
> Jul-19-16 20:50:24 m1-54224-10937 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.0.224
> <[email protected]> to: [email protected] Message-Score: added 5
> (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 8
> Jul-19-16 23:44:38 m1-64678-08355 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.0.233
> <[email protected]> to:
[email protected]
> Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score
for
> this message is now 8
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Thomas Eckardt
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> To: For Users of ASSP
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:08:54
> +0100
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
>
>
> > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/JMEHNLE/Mail-SPF-v2.9.0/CHANGES
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: "Andy Knuts" <[email protected]>
> > An: "For Users of ASSP" <[email protected]>
> > Datum: 18.07.2016 19:56
> > Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm using 2.008 while ASSP says "2.007" is required.
> > Should upgrading to 2.009 fix this issue?
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Thomas Eckardt
> > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > To: For Users of ASSP
> > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:49:45
> > +0100
> > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> >
> >
> > > >Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller:
> > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF
> > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > =item B<query_rr_types>
> > >
> > > For which RR types to query when looking up and selecting SPF
records.
> > The
> > > following values are supported:
> > >
> > > =over
> > >
> > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_all >>
> > >
> > > Both C<TXT> and C<SPF> type RRs.
> > >
> > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_txt >> (default)
> > >
> > > C<TXT> type RRs only.
> > >
> > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_spf >>
> > >
> > > C<SPF> type RRs only.
> > >
> > > =back
> > >
> > > For years B<Mail::SPF> has defaulted to looking up both C<SPF> and
> > C<TXT>
> > > type
> > > RRs as recommended by RFC 4408. Experience has shown, however, that
a
> > > significant portion of name servers suffer from serious brain damage
> > with
> > > regard to the handling of queries for RR types that are unknown to
them,
>
> >
> > > such
> > > as the C<SPF> RR type. Consequently B<Mail::SPF> now defaults to
> > looking
> > > up
> > > only C<TXT> type RRs. This may be overridden by setting the
> > > B<query_rr_types>
> > > option.
> > >
> > > See RFC 4408, 3.1.1, for a discussion of the topic, as well as the
> > > description
> > > of the L</select_record> method.
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Seems your Mail::SPF module is outdated - use 2.009
> > >
> > > ASSP uses the default.
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Von: "Andy Knuts" <[email protected]>
> > > An: "For Users of ASSP" <[email protected]>
> > > Datum: 18.07.2016 19:27
> > > Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm stil wondering what's wrong with my DNS servers and ASSP. I
> > installed
> > > pdns-recorsor on the same host where ASSP is running and I have
> > installed
> > > bind on a second VM.
> > > I tested those name server and they work as expected but ASSP still
has
> > > troubles with some request. Not always, but A LOT.
> > > In my maillog.txt I see a lot of these: hotmail.com: Unknown error
on
> > DNS
> > > 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com'
> > >
> > > Sometimes it has the SPF records for hotmail.com, but many times it
> > > doesn't. If I do "host -t txt hotmail.com 127.0.0.1" it always
works.
> > Same
> > > for "host -t txt hotmail.com 10.1.1.11".
> > >
> > > Here's an example in maillog.txt with SPFDebug enabled:
> > >
> > >
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> info: found message size announcement: 13.26
kByte
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> Message-Score: added -10 (tlsValencePB) for
> > > SSL-TLS-connection-OK, total score for this message is now -10
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS
sockets
> > > for 10.1.1.11
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question:
> > > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer:
> > > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN PTR (
> > >
> > > mail-db5eur01hn0246.outbound.protection.outlook.com. )
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 -
> > > hotmail.com. IN ANY
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 'hotmail.com'
> > type
> > > 'ANY' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 -
> > > hotmail.com. IN ANY
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 'hotmail.com'
> > type
> > > 'ANY' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 20981
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from
nameserver
> > > 127.0.0.1
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: hotmail.com. IN ANY
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 132 IN SOA
(
>
> >
> > > ns1.msft.net. msnhst.microsoft.com.
> > > 2016070805 ;serial
> > > 7200 ;refresh
> > > 900 ;retry
> > > 2419200 ;expire
> > > 3600 ;minimum
> > > )
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN
NS
> > > ns1.msft.net.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN
NS
> > > ns3.msft.net.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN
NS
> > > ns4.msft.net.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN
NS
> > > ns2.msft.net.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from
> > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F434211AA68
> > > x.x.x.139:56018 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] [isbounce] x.x.x.139
bounce
>
> >
> > > message detected
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: the
> > > connection will now be moved in to the Full-Transparent-Proxy mode
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: no
(more)
> > > data readable from x.x.x.139 (connection closed by peer) -
Connection
> > > reset by peer - last command was 'RCPT TO'
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Disconnected: session:7F434211AA68
> > x.x.x.139
> > > - processing time 0 seconds
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added -2 for
> > 65.54.190.0
> > > in griplist (0.18), total score for this message is now -12
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM]
> > 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] DKIM domain mismatch -
> > > hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no DKIM-Signature found in mail
> > header
> > > (Cache)
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 15
> > (dkimValencePB)
> > > for DKIM domain mismatch - hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no
> > > DKIM-Signature found in mail header, total score for this message is
now
>
> > 3
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS
sockets
> > > for 10.1.1.11
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: hotmail.com.
IN
> > > ANY
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
1596
> > IN
> > > MX 5 mx1.hotmail.com.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
3019
> > IN
> > > A 65.55.77.28
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
86728
> > > IN NS ns4.msft.net.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
86728
> > > IN NS ns3.msft.net.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
1596
> > IN
> > > MX 5 mx4.hotmail.com.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
3019
> > IN
> > > A 65.55.85.12
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
86728
> > > IN NS ns1.msft.net.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 425
IN
>
> >
> > > TXT (
> > > "v=spf1 include:spf-a.outlook.com
> > > include:spf-b.outlook.com ip4:157.55.9.128/25
> > > include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-a.hotmail.com
> > > include:_spf-ssg-b.microsoft.com include:_spf-ssg-c.microsoft.com
~all"
> > > )
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
1596
> > IN
> > > MX 5 mx3.hotmail.com.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
3019
> > IN
> > > A 157.55.152.112
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
86728
> > > IN NS ns2.msft.net.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
3019
> > IN
> > > A 157.56.172.28
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.
1596
> > IN
> > > MX 5 mx2.hotmail.com.
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 -
> > > _dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for
> > > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 -
> > > _dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for
> > > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 52169
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from
nameserver
> > > 127.0.0.1
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: _dmarc.hotmail.com.
IN
> > > TXT
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: _dmarc.hotmail.com.
2125
> > IN
> > > TXT (
> > > "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;
> > > rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; fo=1"
> > > )
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from
> > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM]
> > 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip info: domain hotmail.com has
published
>
> > a
> > > DMARC record
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip strictspf Regex: strictSPFRe
> > > '@hotmail.com'
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNSresolver
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] SPF: SPFoverride for domain
hotmail.com -
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller:
> > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller:
> > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com TXT
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] spf_result:temperror
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip identity:[email protected]
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip scope:mfrom
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip spf_record:
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip local_exp:hotmail.com: Unknown
error
> > on
> > > DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com'
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip received_spf:Received-SPF:
temperror
> > > (hotmail.com: Unknown error on DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com')
> > > receiver=mx101.snip; identity=mailfrom;
> > envelope-from="[email protected]";
> > > helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com; client-ip=65.54.190.89
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] SPF: temperror
> > ip=65.54.190.89
> > > [email protected] helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 5
(spfeValencePB)
>
> >
> > > for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 8
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89
> > > <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip DMARC: this mail breakes the DKIM
> > > policies defined in the DMARC record for domain hotmail.com - there
is
> > no
> > > DKIM-signature found in this mail for domain hotmail.com
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS
sockets
> > > for 10.1.1.11
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question:
> > _dmarc.hotmail.com.
> > > IN TXT
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer:
_dmarc.hotmail.com.
> > > 2125 IN TXT (
> > > "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;
> > > rua=mailto:[email protected]; ruf=mailto:[email protected]; fo=1"
> > > )
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 -
> > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for
> > > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1
ID
> > > 54935
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 -
> > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for
> > > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11
ID
> > > 43820
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from
nameserver
> > > 127.0.0.1
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was:
> > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is:
> > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. 19937 IN TXT (
> > >
> > > "0-0=1|1=MICROSOFT
> > >
> >
>
HOSTING|2=7.9|3=7.9|6=0|7=10|8=172544|9=7030|20=bay004-omc2s14.hotmail.com|21=msn.net|22=Y|23=7.1|24=7.2|25=0|40=5.0|41=5.1|43=5.3|44=3.9|45=N|46=19|48=24|50=San
> > >
> > > Jose|51=CA|52=95141|53=US|54=-121.895|55=37.3394"
> > > )
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from
> > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 54935
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F4341FFBE08
> > > 85.158.211.232:34678 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125
> > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [MessageOK]
> > > 65.54.190.89 <[email protected]> to: JMRP@snip message ok [complaint
> > about
> > > message from 10 164 74 35]
> > >
> > >
> > > any idea's?
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Thomas Eckardt
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > To: For Users of ASSP
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:52:29
> > > +0100
> > > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > >
> > >
> > > > >But why is this a temperror?
> > > >
> > > > assp was unable to get a qualified result for the query using
> > Mail::SPF
> > > -
> > > > that's all
> > > > most times this is caused by a DNS timeout
> > > >
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Von: "Andy Knuts" <[email protected]>
> > > > An: [email protected]
> > > > Datum: 18.07.2016 11:53
> > > > Betreff: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Many of the emails that passed ASSP have headers like this:
> > > >
> > > > X-Assp-Received-SPF: temperror ip=217.148.21.174
> > > > [email protected] helo=vmta12.addemar.com
> > > >
> > > > But why is this a temperror?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I use 'spfquery' command line I get:
> > > >
> > > > # spfquery --mail-from [email protected] -i
217.148.21.174
> > -h
> > >
> > > > vmta12.addemar.com
> > > > pass
> > > > Please see
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=rkvcomm%40stratics.addemar.com&ip=217.148.21.174&receiver=spfquery:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 217.148.21.128/25 contains 217.148.21.174
> > > > spfquery: domain of [email protected] designates
> > > 217.148.21.174
> > > > as permitted sender
> > > > Received-SPF: pass (spfquery: domain of
[email protected]
> > > > designates 217.148.21.174 as permitted sender)
> > client-ip=217.148.21.174;
> > >
> > > > [email protected];
helo=vmta12.addemar.com;
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth
and
> > > > traffic
> > > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and
> > protocols
> > >
> > > > are
> > > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for
> > NetFlow,
> > >
> > > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using
capacity
> > > > planning
> > > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Assp-user mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > > *******************************************************
> > > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
> > > legally
> > > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the
use of
>
> >
> > > the
> > > >
> > > > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be
no
> > > > known virus in this email!
> > > > *******************************************************
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
> > > traffic
> > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and
protocols
>
> >
> > > are
> > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for
NetFlow,
>
> >
> > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using
capacity
> > > planning
> > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Assp-user mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > *******************************************************
> > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
> > legally
> > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use
of
> > the
> > >
> > > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be
no
> > > known virus in this email!
> > > *******************************************************
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
> > traffic
> > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and
protocols
> > are
> > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for
NetFlow,
> > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
> > planning
> > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Assp-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > DISCLAIMER:
> > *******************************************************
> > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
legally
> > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of
the
>
> >
> > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> > known virus in this email!
> > *******************************************************
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols
are
>
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
> planning
> reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols
are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
