On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:31:43 +0200 Irek Szczesniak wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Roland Mainz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > ---- >> > >> > Attached (as "astksh20130913_md5sum_compat1.diff.txt") is a patch >> > which fixes an incompatibility between AST md5sum(1)&&co. and GNU >> > coreutils md5sum(1)&&co. fixes. >> > >> > There are three major differences which caused hiccups for 3rd-party >> > scripts: >> > - GNU coreutils md5sum/sha1sum/sha224sum/sha256sum default to text mode >> > - GNU coreutils use a " *" before the file name to indicate binary >> > mode and " " to indicate text mode... the AST hash utilities used >> > only a single blank " " instead. >> > - "-t" means "text mode" for GNU coreutils while AST used this for "total" >> > >> > * Notes: >> > - GNU and AST *sum(1) utilities now have identical output and seem to >> > be 100% compatible with each other >> > - On platforms which do not implement |O_BINARY| and |O_TEXT| the >> > change only affects the seperator (" "/" *"(=new) vs. " "(=old)). >> > Portable applications can use [[:space:]]+ in egrep(1) to make sure >> > they can match the hashes against both the old and new versions of AST >> > *sum(1) >> > - The output *intentionally* changes only for utilities matching the >> > shell pattern "*@(md5|sha@(1|224|256|384|512))sum". This is done to >> > maintain compatibility for cksum(1) and sum(1) >> > - AST does not have a sha224sum(1) utility (yet) ... need to talk to >> > Glenn about this > >> Roland and Glenn: Roland added entry points for sha1sum(1), >> sha2sum(1), sha256sum(1), sha384sum(1) and sha512sum(1) but they do >> not appear in /opt/ast/bin. Could you check why this happens, please? > > do you have $INSTALLROOT/bin/nmake in your build tree?
No, I only imported ast-ksh into my git (laziness). However I think the root cause is that the script which creates the entries for /opt/ast assumes one builtin == one source file, right? Irek _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
