On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:28:21PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > when building ast-ksh (2012-08-01, which seems to be the latest > "production" release) on freebsd10.i386 with clang, the build failed in >[ ... ] > I that the issue had been addressed sometime between the 2012-08-01 > release and the current alpha (2013-12-06)
If you're interested in not running your own patches but sticking with what's been released? You might check against the 2013-02-14 beta as well. What you found might have been addressed by then. My production environment (made with runtime packages built from source) is currently the last ast-open release 2012-08-01, with the last ast-base beta 2013-02-14 layered on top (there were patches going back to October of 2012 I wanted). So far it seems to work pretty well. (Am I jinxing myself?) There are small parts of the beta that will not build cleanly (e.g., the dss builtins for ksh), but overall, everything seems to work well enough, and avoids all the breakage in more recent alpha releases. I'm sure someone will now tell me that it's bad to layer INIT and ast-base 2013-02 on top of an INIT and ast-open from 2012-08 in the same tree. I await the corrections and better advice. :-) Cheers, Bob -- Bob Krzaczek, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, RIT phone +1-585-4757196, email [email protected], icbm 43.0858N 77.6774W
pgpaslUEobK59.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
