On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:36:56PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> "Dr. Werner Fink" wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:22:49AM +0100, I. Szczesniak wrote:
> > > On 12/16/08, Dr. Werner Fink <[email protected]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > test io.sh failed at 2008-12-15+10:37:40 with exit code 1 [ 70 tests
> > > > 1 signal ]
> > > >
> > > > On IA64:
> > > >
> > > > test arith.sh begins at 2008-12-15+10:42:55
> > > > arith.sh[452]: printf '%g\n' $((-Nan)) failed -- expected
> > > > -nan, got nan
> > > > arith.sh[454]: printf '%g\n' -Nan failed -- expected -nan, got
> > > > nan
> > > > arith.sh[456]: print -- $((-Nan)) failed -- expected -nan, got
> > > > nan
> > > > test arith.sh failed at 2008-12-15+10:42:55 with exit code 3 [ 127
> > > > tests 3 errors ]
> > >
> > > Did you disable IEEE754 math support? Negative nan is defined in
> > > IEEE754-1985 and mandatory required in IEEE 754-2008.
> >
> > I use the same spec file for all architectures. I'm not aware on
> > any switch which would enable or disable any math support. it is
> > simply the defaults of the gcc and the defaults of the build for
> > the distribution which includes specific architecture switches
> > but nothing influence math support.
>
> Please use gcc in C99 mode, e.g.
> $ CC="gcc -std=gnu99 -fPIC" ./bin/package make CC="gcc -std=gnu99 -fPIC"
> #. Note this must be set in the CC variable and _not_ in CCFLAGS.
>
> This is the same what we do for the official ksh93 in Solaris (e.g.
> force the compiler to operate in C99-conformant mode), otherwise ksh93
> misses some C99 math functions... ;-(
Does not make any difference ;(
Werner
--
"Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
