On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:32 PM, ольга крыжановская
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael or any other Linux guru, can you look why ksh (2012-06-28, the
> non doomsday release) no longer uses posix_spawn?
> I am getting this line when I build ksh on Fedora:
> iffe: test: posix_spawn exists and it works and its worth using ... no
>
> This doesn't sound right, IMO ksh should prefer (and benefit) from
> using posix_spawn()

This is interesting. I thought both Linux and Solaris use
posix_spawn() to avoid the much more expensive vfork()/exec().

Irek

_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to