On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 03:55:50 +0200 =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?= wrote: > Why is mamake not compiling with C++? What is the later catastrophe? I > am curious, since this may be an issue with portability across C > language variations.
C++ is pedantic about things that C isn't since the code has never seen a C++ compiler it evolved to satisfy C with g++ mamake.c failed with: mamake.c:2215: error: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'void*' arguably wrong but ok with all C compilers that hit it and there were also a bazillion warnings like this: mamake.c:2209: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' I'm not opposed to getting it to compile with a C++ compiler but right now its not a high priority on my todo list the first few rounds would probably feel like death by a thousand diagnostics _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@research.att.com https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
