Are there any objections to depreciate typeset -l and typeset -u in
favor of typeset -M tolower and typeset -M toupper? The goal would be
to map these two options to their -M counterparts and let ksh93 -n
complain about their usage. IMO it should save same code space in the
shell core code and would promote more usage of typeset -M

Irek
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
ast-developers@research.att.com
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to