On 28 September 2012 07:44, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote: > > { INIT ast-ksh } 2012-09-27 alphas posted to > www.research.att.com/sw/download/alpha/ > > the next alpha will migrate current -lcmdtst ksh builtins to -lcmd, > will static bind all -lcmd builtins to the /opt/ast/bin virtual dir, > and will provide a way to rename /opt/ast/bin via the environment
We experience more failures on Linux, both latest Suse and Fedora (posix_spawn() has been disabled): test arrays begins at 2012-09-28+09:38:47 arrays.sh[665]: Fooa[a] is {Foo[a]} not AA test arrays failed at 2012-09-28+09:50:19 with exit code 1 [ 147 tests 1 error ] test options begins at 2012-09-28+10:18:25 ./src/cmd/ksh93/tests/options.sh: line 121: 25075: Memory fault ./src/cmd/ksh93/tests/options.sh: line 125: 25079: Memory fault options.sh[420]: option i not in $- options.sh[420]: option E not in $- options.sh[429]: option interactive not equivalent to i options.sh[429]: option rc not equivalent to E options.sh[446]: setting HISTFILE when not in environment fails test options failed at 2012-09-28+10:18:31 with exit code 1 [ 143 tests 1 error ] test pty begins at 2012-09-28+10:18:45 pty.sh[152]: POSIX sh 091(C): line 164: expected "^hello\r?\n$", got EOF pty.sh[168]: POSIX sh 093(C): line 176: expected "^hello\r?\n$", got EOF pty.sh[184]: POSIX sh 094(C): line 194: expected "^hello\r?\n$", got EOF pty.sh[227]: POSIX sh 097(C): line 235: expected "^ok\r?\n$", got EOF pty.sh[431]: process/terminal group exercise: line 435: expected ":$|:\E|lines", got EOF test pty failed at 2012-09-28+10:18:46 with exit code 1 [ 20 tests 1 error ] The pty failures are specific to Suse, but only because Suse ships /usr/bin/pty which is required by the test. Ced -- Cedric Blancher <cedric.blanc...@googlemail.com> Institute Pasteur _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@research.att.com https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers