I'd rather train ksh/ast users to include ${.sh.version}/upstream-version in
bug reports
rather than train me to grok distro X version nomenclature
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:32:22 +0200 Lionel Cons wrote:
> On 23 October 2012 15:20, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Version: 93u+-1.1
> >
> > not sure about this nomenclature
> > ast ksh reports a version matching "93[a-z][-+]? YYYY-MM-DD"
> These are Debian version numbers. Oliver Kiddle <okid...@yahoo.co.uk>
> can explain how they translate into ast/ksh version numbers.
> Lionel
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
ast-developers@research.att.com
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
