On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Cedric Blancher
<cedric.blanc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 19 October 2012 00:59, Roland Mainz <roland.ma...@nrubsig.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Cedric Blancher
>> <cedric.blanc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On 13 October 2012 16:40, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote:
>>>> ast-ksh 2012-10-12 alpha posted
>>>
>>> LGTM (looks good to me), but od and tr are missing. We use the
>>> combination of od+head+tail and ~(X) to classify binary files and tr
>>> for quick&dirty conversion jobs (like dos2unix and Japanese
>>> processing).
>>
>> For the log: In the ksh93-integration project we moved tr.c and od.c
>> to libcmd as preparation to use these builtins to replace the
>> (rotten&&unmaintained&&standard-violating) old versions in /usr/bin.
>> Testing by Sun (PIT+standards) did work smoothly (except issues in
>> "od" which were promptly fixed by Glenn and the issue that 'tr"
>> doesn't support XPG6's "-C") ... so technically I don't see problems
>> with moving those two to libcmd, too.
>
> Thanks for lobbying :)

Grumpf... that wasn't an attempt in lobbying... I only tried to
explain that the risk is quite low because some else already tried
that path and didn't fail in unexpected and horribly ways... :-)

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 3992797
 (;O/ \/ \O;)
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
ast-developers@research.att.com
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to