I'll comment that the lack of a public issue tracker and source code repository is a major hindrance to bug reporting and patch development---did somebody already identify or patch a particular bug, or was it otherwise already fixed in the upstream?---and makes it difficult to gauge release-worthiness.
-- Nathan Weeks IT Specialist USDA-ARS Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit Crop Genome Informatics Laboratory Iowa State University http://weeks.public.iastate.edu/ On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:38:48 -0500 > From: "Terrence J. Doyle" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ast-users] ksh93v? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > > I've been finding so many bugs in Version ABIJM 93v- 2014-12-24 that I > don't see how it can be deemed release-worthy. > > We need more people in the community to download the beta, test it, > make bug reports and even provide patches. Feel free to join in. > > I'm trying to get out reports and patches out myself, but it's one of > those things where, as I investigate one bug, I find more bugs. > > You use find -print0? So, some of the path names you deal with contain > embedded newlines? Have you tried tw? It's really quite powerful. > > Terrence Doyle > > On 9/20/15 3:28 PM, Aaron Davies wrote: >> any idea when ksh93v will ship? i'm eagerly awaiting read -d '', which is >> currently the only reason i have for writing anything in bash >> >> (i have to deal with a lot of trees of arbitrarily-named files, so find >> -print0|while IFS= read -rd '' is essential to many of my ad-hoc scripts) _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
