> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Juan Lestoni wrote: > > > Regarding SER vs. Asterisk as SIP server, when it comes to manage NAT > > with SER + rtpproxy, is SER still in an order of magnitude above > > Asterisk, or have both the same performance in number of concurrent > > calls ? > Yes. > > Also, keep in mind, its not the number of concurrent calls, its calls > setup/teardowns per second. (Even with rtpproxying) > > -alex >
Hang on... wouldn't RTP proxying be more of a load on the SER than call setup/teardowns? After all, with proxying the server is receiving AND retransmitting each active call's media stream, so would that be the limiting factor not call setup/teardown per second.... ???? Tim _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
