I agree with you completely. It sound like there are loop holes and many providers can call their solution compliant. Personally speaking my company will not put any outbound DID into service unless my client can use it in the event of an emergency. To be successful in selling "voip-dialtone" the client wants it to be just like their PSTN lines at a lower flat rate. Would you put your employees life's in jeopardy to save 15 bucks a month? I wouldn't.
Tim Booth President VisionCom 207-828-4600 Office VoIP 207-618-1419 WIFI VoIP 207-321-2789 NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately telephone or e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts or agreements referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses that may your own computer system. While Vision Systems Inc. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Osterberg Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:21 AM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] 911 On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, C F wrote: > No not at all, business decisions have nothing to do with being > compliant, as stated in previous emails. It is very easy to be > compliant, since if you are not what the FCC calls a provider for > "Interconnected VoIP service" you are already compliant. The Intent was to improve access to emergency services on devices the general public might mistake for a telephone. I don't care if it's legal or not, as a VoIP provider to the public, (if that's what you want to do) you should be working on a solution. Even non US firms should consider the 'needs' of their customers and work solutions out. Our company had a working E911 solution from day one (At least for fixed location customers where we had trunking to a local CLEC) Nomadic users are another problem. At least put some effort into it. -=I supose I should plug my company here=- Sound Choice Communications LLC Minneapolis / StPaul - Minnesota +1.651-999-0888 voice line [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
