Senad, Please accept my apologies if my message came across as if I was trying to bash your product. That was not my intention.
However, it did help me understand a bit better your product line. If I would be in need of such solution, I know I can go to your company for an integrated suite of products that will achieve all those goals. I simply got the impression that PBXware "alone" was capable of handling it. Thanks, Daniel On Thu, January 25, 2007 6:43 pm, Senad Jordanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Senad, >> >> My answer would be: >> >> "Real-life service providers" would need a solution that is a >> load-balancing, scaleable, redundant, fault-tolerant architecture and >> PBXware would need to be a key ingredient in all of that (aside all >> the hardware and network-layer elements). >> >> Thanks, >> Daniel > > Daniel, > > Single server "multi-tenant" product will not achieve above in its default > configuration without help from another application/service or complete > re-design. > > And... As for PBXware, it performs beautifully in fully redundant, load > balanced, scalable , fault tolerant architecture with its "family" solution > called: SERVERware. Tested, deployed in "real life deployments". > > Of course PBXware is not "The key ingredient"... Nothing happens by its self > or work alone. UNIX is one of the finest examples hence why SERVERware is > needed. > > > > Senad > > > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
