Did you made a proporsal or economic analisis in implementing Asterisk?

On 2/8/07, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alistair Cunningham wrote:
> Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/8/07, *Alistair Cunningham* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Ignacio,
>>
>>     We have some Enswitch (which uses Asterisk and SER for telephony)
>>     customers with up to 60000 users. To achieve this requires a
>> substantial
>>     cluster. A cluster of this size requires substantial planning, but
>>     smaller clusters for hundreds or thousands of users are described
>> at:
>>
>>
>> you say 60,000 users, how many concurrent channels?  Is that the 200
>> that you mentioned or is that 200 per box?
>
> Trixter,
>
> I can't give you concurrent call figures for these systems as we
> haven't got permission from our customers to share this information,
> though you can safely assume many more than 200 total concurrent calls.
>
> The 200 concurrent calls in my previous email is per Asterisk machine
> (with all but the smallest Enswitch systems having more than one
> Asterisk machine), and is general advice to new customers. The exact
> figure will of course depend on hardware, codecs, average call length,
> etc.
>
> Alistair Cunningham
> +1 888 468 3111
> +44 20 799 39 799
> sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://integrics.com/
>
How does average call length have anything to do with number of
concurrent calls?

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz

Reply via email to