Did you made a proporsal or economic analisis in implementing Asterisk?
On 2/8/07, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alistair Cunningham wrote: > Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: >> >> >> On 2/8/07, *Alistair Cunningham* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> Ignacio, >> >> We have some Enswitch (which uses Asterisk and SER for telephony) >> customers with up to 60000 users. To achieve this requires a >> substantial >> cluster. A cluster of this size requires substantial planning, but >> smaller clusters for hundreds or thousands of users are described >> at: >> >> >> you say 60,000 users, how many concurrent channels? Is that the 200 >> that you mentioned or is that 200 per box? > > Trixter, > > I can't give you concurrent call figures for these systems as we > haven't got permission from our customers to share this information, > though you can safely assume many more than 200 total concurrent calls. > > The 200 concurrent calls in my previous email is per Asterisk machine > (with all but the smallest Enswitch systems having more than one > Asterisk machine), and is general advice to new customers. The exact > figure will of course depend on hardware, codecs, average call length, > etc. > > Alistair Cunningham > +1 888 468 3111 > +44 20 799 39 799 > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://integrics.com/ > How does average call length have anything to do with number of concurrent calls? _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz