Thanks for the comments, however the tech issues are under the control of our engineering team and Digium's ever-vigilant developers (aka Russell Bryant & Co.).
I was simply asking whether any other service provider had found a workaround for the issue. To ask a tech question on a biz list is simply not kosha / Halal / Vegan or whatever. BTW - to use the term "Telco Grade Asterisk" is possibly premature. Thanks Craig Lawrence -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Pierce Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2008 2:01 AM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] IAX Channels limit on Asterisk 1.4.17 On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 11:26 +0100, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: > These are some of the biggest reasons I personally avoid iax. I just > dont consider this type of bottlenecking to be 'carrier class'. It is > an inherent problem of using a single port for UDP (connectionless > really) communications. Trixter, Thanks for explaining these IAX issues so clearly. I had been tending to lean towards using IAX, but what you are saying makes perfect sense. Bob _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz