On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 18:39 -0500, Steve Totaro wrote: > > > On Jan 17, 2008 6:26 PM, Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Brian West wrote: > > > You shouldn't have to contact Digium for such use cases as > "Asterisk > > Compatible" or "Works with Asterisk". > > in defense of digium, blame google for this. > > digium has to protect its trademark. google's only mechanism > is to filter > based on trademark and allow use permitted by trademark owner > only. this > isn't digium's fault. > > -alex > > That is BS. Obviously all the products that "Work with Windows" do > not have this issue or Adwords that use Windows. The same is true for > basically all phone systems. > > Digium initiated this. I suspect it came from the Adtran/Digium guys > that just don't get Open Source. > Steve they don't call it Vulture capital because of their kind hearted nature :)
> To be approved you must agree to only sell Digium hardware or make > some kind of special case. When I first started with Asterisk, one of > the main points was that it was vendor neutral. > > Thanks, > Steve Totaro > > Dave _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
