Ports. make sure you cvsup your ports tree, I belive it came out like a week or 2 ago. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk on BSD discussion" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 6:50 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P
> Where did you find this rev? I've tried ports, and the > zaptel page? > > Bill > > > On May 6, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Chris St Denis wrote: > > > 0.9_1 is the current version of zaptel for freeBSD > > > > seems stable for me with a 4 digium port pri card. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Harris > > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:55 PM > > To: Asterisk on BSD discussion > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P > > > > > > Is there a fix to the zaptel 0.8 code to address the > > machine hangs on interrupt? I've installed the patch > > that was posted back in March. > > > > OS: 5.3-RELEASE > > Zaptel 0.8 and nightly both hang on zttest, or OS shutdown... > > > > Is the 400P stable under FreeBSD 5.3? > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > On May 1, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Lane wrote: > > > >> On Sunday 01 May 2005 07:39, Kim Culhan wrote: > >>> --- Matt Riddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> After seeing a post from someone in the Asterisk users list on the > >>>> topic > >>>> of frame slips with the TDM400P, it turns out that he isn't getting > >>>> them > >>>> on FreeBSD. > >>>> > >>>> Any chance some other people could run zttest and post back the > >>>> results? > >>>> > >>>> Most Linux systems are getting less than 100% at the moment (albeit > >>>> not > >>>> by much). > >>>> > >>>> What do you guys get? > >>> > >>> I put a post on the Asterisk list yesterday with the output of > >>> zttest -v, showing nothing but: > >>> > >>> 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% > >>> > >>> When running this on another machine which is running asterisk > >>> compiled from the same source, the results are not quite as good > >>> showing 100.000000% on 59 of 60 passes. The exception showing > >>> 99.987793% > >>> > >>> Should the test be run over a span of several minutes ? Hours ? > >>> > >>> There are differences in the machines, a slower cpu in the case > >>> above among others.. > >>> > >>> Soo.. what do others get? > >>> > >>> -kim > >>> > >> I get 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% on a Dell SC420 > >> with > >> 128Meg o' Ram, Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.53GHz (2527.01-MHz 686-class > >> CPU) on > >> FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 #0 > >> > >> He only runs asterisk so 128Meg seems to be fine for now. > >> > >> lane > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Asterisk-BSD mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
