Uhohhh Uhmmm Game ON!!! : ) Tell ya what, if someone says theyll commit it, if we agree to maintain it, you game to help create a new updated port ?
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 22:19 -0600, Gil Kloepfer wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 10:25:17PM -0500, William Lloyd wrote: > > You could contribute to update the port. It doesn;t happen magically. > > I realize this is a little off topic but I couldn't help but respond > to this. > > I have submitted three items to FreeBSD -- two are NIS-related bugfixes > (kern/26486, bin/64445) and one is an enhancement to atacontrol > (complete with the manpage update, bin/81692). They've been completely > ignored. The NIS-related problems were critical to the FreeBSD systems > I've deployed where I work. > > I guess the bottom line is that to do work that seems to go into a > black hole is not much of a motivator to do more. I was actually > considering redoing the Asterisk port so that there were options > that could be selected (and end up in /var/db/ports) that make it > so that ALL of Asterisk doesn't need to be built (and, thus, doesn't > need prerequisites for things I will never use). It just didn't > seem to be worth the effort. > > I have been a FreeBSD evangelist for over 10 years. Unfortunately > these kinds of experiences may change that feeling. > > --- > Gil Kloepfer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
