We now have a working AMP on FreeBSD for Asterisk, ported to FreeBSD and running on a test server. seeing as so much work was involved if we dont get further support from the guys who write and maintain AMP well i guess you could consider this a fork. Though I would prefer that the be receptive to patches to address their non-portability issue. This needs testers also.. Any takers let me know and ill toss a snapshot of the work up on our site.
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 09:31 +0800, Lists wrote: > been there done it... i can whip you up a asterisk FreeBSD bootable cd, > can you get AMP working if so i can make it completely turn-key and > installable > > On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 16:12 -0600, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > > Quick update on my progress, for anyone who cares :) > > > > I have the flash operator panel working, which is actually what I was > > mostly interested in. I spent another full day trying to get a flash > > plugin to work with ANY browser under FreeBSD. What a pain! I finally > > got flash 6 working with linuxpluginwrapper and mozilla, but there must be > > something strange with the FOP. It won't display in my mozilla. The same > > mozilla can see other flash content, though, such as Hallmark :) Anyone > > have any ideas? A windows box with IE works fine... > > > > As far as AMP goes I am still battling with it. I have some things > > working, but mostly it is still a large kludge. I may start over. > > > > I have a new grand vision, however. I want a bootable live CD image that > > runs asterisk + AMP against configuration files on a USB pen drive or CF > > card. Anyone tried this? > > > > Thanks, > > > > j > > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, William Lloyd wrote: > > > > > > > If you are comfortable with manually editing files I'd stick with > > > > that or look at a package that handles realtime instead. > > > > > > > > /bin/sh is the portable way to make install scripts. > > > > > > > > AMP has so many kludges and hard coded things it's really best to run > > > > it on a dedicated box. > > > > > > You can say that again. Kludge city. I am rewriting all the install > > > scripts now. I refuse to be beaten :) > > > > > > j > > > > > > > > > > > -bill > > > > > > > > On 4-Nov-05, at 8:59 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Howdy, > > > > > > > > > > Anyone manage to get this running? I've been impressed by comments > > > > > about > > > > > it on various lists, so decided to give it a shot. I've been at it > > > > > for > > > > > three days now, off and on, and am struggling. Linux folks seem to > > > > > take > > > > > lots of paths for granted, as well as installed options. I've > > > > > never seen > > > > > install scripts written for /bin/bash! Bad options to sed, a > > > > > requirement > > > > > to run your web server as "asterisk", etc, etc. I've been very > > > > > happy with > > > > > asterisk by itself for over a month now, and it seems I am almost > > > > > starting > > > > > over to use this silly package. Is it worth it? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > j > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > > > > > > > > !DSPAM:436b71a4379222288611498! > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
