On 01/30/07 06:08 Vince Vielhaber said the following:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
Ok, answering myself, branch seems to be what I should've been building
instead of trunk. With the exception of a problem in the makefile in
oct612s (it didn't know how to make install) all went well!
Is this 1.2 or 1.4 zaptel you are building?
1.4
I think if you are building branch, you are building 1.2.
I could be wrong though, and if so I am making the same mistake you
are. :)
That's what threw me, I thought branch would be the current code but *
wouldn't compile with it. In the branches directory is a subdirectory
called zaptel-1.4 and all went well with that. Even had a telemarketer
call on it a little while ago - gonna fix that little problem real quick!
trunk contains the working zaptel-bsd code, which not necessarily will work
with asterisk 1.4. branches/zaptel-1.4 is the work-in-progress leading up
to a release of zaptel-bsd which will work with asterisk 1.4.
i'm currently still in the process of porting over stuff from zaptel 1.4 to
branches.
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do |
| for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do |
| echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." |
| done; done |
+=========================================================================+
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
