On Thursday 06 August 2009 09:18:18 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Thursday 06 August 2009 04:48:00 Max Khon wrote: > > BTW, do one still have to use your own version of chan_capi with ISDN4BSD > > and Asterisk? Why stock version can not be used (if you implement CAPI > > 2.0)? > > Because the stock one is buggy with regard to how locks are handled, and > does not fully expose all the features in ISDN4BSD. >
And more. If you diff the code you will see that the two are completly different, in how configuration and calls are handled. One feature that lacks in the stock chan_capi, is the ability to dynamically reload the configuration. Not sure if that was fixed recently. --HPS _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- Asterisk-BSD mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
