On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:32:41PM -0500, John Todd wrote: [snip] > 4) Branch Asterisk to a new CVS server somewhere else that is > then more exposed to various programmers > > Number 4 is the least likely and "worst" option in the tree, but I > include it as an option to be complete. [snip]
Im not that convinced.. I believe it would do * good to finally accept that it is in fact a split project allready - one digium-non-gpl-branch payed for by digium customers, and one gpl-branch for everyone else. More importantly, however, it would allow for more contributions, and more evenly split workload for the participating developers. Solution 3) does this also - and is perhaps better, since it wouldnt alienate the digium folks, who have done one heck of a job so far. But solution 1) or 2) would in the long run have the same problems we have today - and are only superior if combined with 3) or 4) (IMHO). //Martin -- ################################################################### My idea of roughing it is when room service is late. ###################################################################
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
