Steve Underwood wrote:

Jesse Kaijen wrote:

The reason I like to use the IAX-protocol is that the new jitterbuffer is
based on the E-MOS algorithm (PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG). **see_below**


Why is that good? the new jitter buffer is intended to be an improvement, but it is certainly not state of the art. Far better results are possible.


Are you talking about the JB, our the WSOLA timescale modification stuff you talked about before?

I think that, even without changing the architecture of things a lot, we could do the WSOLA stuff by adding a "timescale" parameter to frames, and during translation or wherever we would do PLC initially, we could adjust the playout based on that timescale. The jitterbuffer could pretty easily add the data to drive this (where, it would do something like adjust 10 frames up or down 10% whenever it's dropping or interpolating now).

-SteveK

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to