Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
ast-one dial(IAX2/)'s ast-two. Both are CVS HEAD within a week of today.
ast-two's context for ast-one's type=user is somecontext.
[somecontext] exten => 100,1,NoOp(One) exten => 100,2,Hangup
exten => 200,1,NoOp(Two) exten => 200,2,Hangup
exten => i,1,Wait(1) exten => i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong) exten => i,3,Hangup
Now, when ast-one Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/300) I get an immediate failure with DIALSTATUS set to NOANSWER.
This is bad. Why? Because I cannot tell the difference between dialing a valid extension that does not answer, and dialing an invalid extension, and thus it is impossible to provide a failover scenario. Further, extension 'i' is not being triggered even though it should.
Similarly, I have a PRI and DIDs from 555-0001 thorugh 555-0030 inclusive. My 23 Zap channels dump into the pri context:
[pri] exten => 555-0001,1,NoOp(0001) exten => 555-0001,2,Hangup
exten => 555-0002,1,NoOp(0002) exten => 555-0002,2,Hangup
exten => i,1,Wait(1) exten => i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong) exten => i,3,Hangup
Now when someone calls 555-0003 the call gets routed to be. However, the 'i' extension again does not get triggered, Asterisk refuses the call and the Telco sends back a "number not in service" message.
If I did NOT have 'i' in there I would agree with this behaviour. However, since the extension is invalid, I should be triggering 'i'.
Can anyone refute this logic? I want to get everyone's opinion before I start an attempt to fix this.
Next time try to use ACTUAL stuff from your dialplan. 555-1212 is NOT correct unless your telco is REALLY REALLY WEIRD. The telco will send 5551212 Telephone numbers do not contain non-numbers.
-- Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. Mark Twain _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
