On May 27, 2005 12:32 pm, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > On Friday 27 May 2005 05:33, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Using zaptel just for a time source is silly. We should use POSIX > > timers instead. Here's a start, but I don't know how long it'll be > > before I can get to finish it, so I thought I'd post it here in the > > hope that someone else will pick it up. > > As noted here: > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2002-April/002072.html > > software timers are lacking.
That link doesn't have *any* information whatsoever on why. 1000Hz should be trivial to generate on a PC. hell I was doing this back in the DOS days with the PIT. Granted things have changed a bit since then but I hardly think that a crystal oscillator on a PCI chipset *designed* to be as cheap as humanly possible is "great precision" as the link indicates. :-) -A. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
