please stop sending me these emails..brian bellAt 12:53 PM 1/20/2006,
you wrote:
Send asterisk-dev mailing list submissions to
asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of asterisk-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty PRI 2B channel
transfer for NI2 PRI line ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
2. Re: bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty PRI 2B channel
transfer for NI2 PRI line (Steven Critchfield)
3. Re: bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty PRI 2B channel
transfer for NI2 PRI line (North Antara)
4. Re: bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty PRI 2B channel
transfer for NI2 PRI line ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
5. RE: bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty PRI 2Bchannel
transfer for NI2 PRI line (Steve Totaro)
6. how to enable app_queue inband call progress to caller
(Raymond Chen)
7. ztdummy question (Sean Cook)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:14:35 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [asterisk-dev] bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty PRI
2B channel transfer for NI2 PRI line
To: asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Maintainer: Express Line
Date opened: January 17, 2006
Status: Open
Value of bounty: $5000.00
Licensing for code: We retain intellectual rights to the underlying source
code.
We need Asterisk (stable version) to be able to perform a 2B channel
transfer for a NI2 B8ZS PRI line. We can't use a channelized T1 at the
time for our work. This feature is commonly called a call transfer on
analog phone lines. On an analog phone line, the incoming call is
answered, a hook-flash is performed to get stutter dialtone, the telephone
number to transfer to is dialed, and finally the caller hangs up the phone
to complete the call transfer. This frees up the analog phone line to
process another call and the central office handles the transfered call.
This transfer feature can be done with a channelized winkstart T1, and is
possible on a PRI. On a PRI, this feature is called a 2B Channel Transfer.
Contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:35:01 -0600
From: Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty
PRI 2B channel transfer for NI2 PRI line
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 13:14 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maintainer: Express Line
> Date opened: January 17, 2006
> Status: Open
> Value of bounty: $5000.00
> Licensing for code: We retain intellectual rights to the underlying source
> code.
please don't spam this list. So far you have only posted messages that
are primarily offtopic since they didn't actually pertain to the code of
asterisk but rather solicitation of someone to do the work.
I don't want to discourage the use of bounties, but rather I want to
encourage better mailinglist ettiquette.
--
Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:39:06 -0800 (PST)
From: "North Antara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty
PRI 2B channel transfer for NI2 PRI line
To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 13:14 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Maintainer: Express Line
>> Date opened: January 17, 2006
>> Status: Open
>> Value of bounty: $5000.00
>> Licensing for code: We retain intellectual rights to the underlying
>> source
>> code.
>
> please don't spam this list. So far you have only posted messages that
> are primarily offtopic since they didn't actually pertain to the code of
> asterisk but rather solicitation of someone to do the work.
>
> I don't want to discourage the use of bounties, but rather I want to
> encourage better mailinglist ettiquette.
> --
> Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Indeed. In fact, one should probably be posting these messages to the
-biz mailing list instead. That's what it's for, right?
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:46:55 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty
PRI 2B channel transfer for NI2 PRI line
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Steven Critchfield wrote:
> please don't spam this list. So far you have only posted messages that
> are primarily offtopic since they didn't actually pertain to the code of
> asterisk but rather solicitation of someone to do the work.
Indeed. The proper forum would be -biz list. (or -users, or voip wiki)
-alex
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:43:44 -0500
From: "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [asterisk-dev] bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty
PRI 2Bchannel transfer for NI2 PRI line
To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Post to the biz list or here www.asteriskhelpdesk.com
<http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 1/20/2006 1:14 PM
To: asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com
Cc:
Subject: [asterisk-dev] bounty update $5000.00 - Asterisk bounty
PRI 2Bchannel transfer for NI2 PRI line
Maintainer: Express Line
Date opened: January 17, 2006
Status: Open
Value of bounty: $5000.00
Licensing for code: We retain intellectual rights to the
underlying source
code.
We need Asterisk (stable version) to be able to perform a 2B
channel
transfer for a NI2 B8ZS PRI line. We can't use a channelized T1
at the
time for our work. This feature is commonly called a call
transfer on
analog phone lines. On an analog phone line, the incoming call
is
answered, a hook-flash is performed to get stutter dialtone, the
telephone
number to transfer to is dialed, and finally the caller hangs up
the phone
to complete the call transfer. This frees up the analog phone
line to
process another call and the central office handles the
transfered call.
This transfer feature can be done with a channelized winkstart
T1, and is
possible on a PRI. On a PRI, this feature is called a 2B Channel
Transfer.
Contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 5314 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20060120/9649d8af/attachment-0001.bin
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:42:23 -0800
From: "Raymond Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [asterisk-dev] how to enable app_queue inband call progress
to caller
To: "'Asterisk Developers Mailing List'"
<asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi all,
I would like to have the caller in app_queue to hear inband call progress
ringing instead of music on hold. Using options 'r' will enforce false
ringtone which is not what I want, I want the app_dial call progress forward
to app_queue instead. Can anyone give me some hints on how to make this
happen?
Thanks
Ray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20060120/93da32fd/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:52:25 -0500
From: Sean Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [asterisk-dev] ztdummy question
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
with the changes to the ztdummy to rely on rtc vs jiffies, I am now
forced to increase the interrupt frequency time by roughly 10x the
frequency recommended for the SMP processing systems.
Is this wise? Or would it be better to not assume that the CONFIG_HZ ==
1000 and base the calculation on what ever HZ is set to?
Maybe for me the solution is to not rely on ztdummy at all ( i will be
using a te210P in this server ).
If I am way off on this question, i apologize... it just seem strange.
Sean
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD0U2Jy9wPyZpnL2URAn6lAJ4rKPI9u8K0wEqVNFrZqpgU+1agdgCaA9R8
zD17R6tA/33wuot8rQE1s3s=
=is5A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
End of asterisk-dev Digest, Vol 18, Issue 62
********************************************
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 1/20/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 1/20/2006
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
