On 27/01/06, tim panton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If I read the patch right this was a bug where a signed 32bit quantity was > treated as if it were unsigned (or the other was around). > > You'll only catch this kind of thing with lint, and/or strict use of > macros/functions to do time comparisons. >
I thought that gcc warns when comparing signed and unsigned quantities. gcc cannot warn about wrap arounds though. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
