Jeremy McNamara ha scritto:
Here we go again - how does one function equal 50% of a HUGE patch?
One very trivial, very standard function MAY have been used, which
still remains to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Any developer can confirm this:
That patch has a bunch of constants rename (that reflects the chan_sccp
constants name) + some structure
The only relevant addition in that patch is the button template function
(the one included in the chan_sccp project since july or august 2005)
So stop it!
Sergio
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
