Russell Bryant wrote: > A reentrant function: > > - Does not hold static data over successive calls
OK, given this definition I'd agree, but I'm concerned that the more common understanding of non-reentrant functions (in most people's minds) is that the function is also not thread-safe, but in this case we have a non-reentrant function that IS thread-safe (in spite of the quote you supplied implying that such a thing may not be possible <G>). Given that, the comment in utils.h in trunk is completely accurate, so we should probably copy those doc changes back down to 1.4 as well. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
