On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 10:59 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:57:38PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > > > > ----- "Rod Dorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is IAX always going to be over TCP? > > > > IAX has never been and never will be TCP. It is UDP based. > > But CDR data really needs what TCP has to offer. > > What you do is re-implement TCP (or TCP/with a bit of SSL). While it > might work, ,it is not as good as the original.
The only thing needed is guarenteed delivery. IAX full frames in UDP already do that. Seems to work fine for most people. > Anotherthing I have a "bad feeling about" is tying the CDR to a specific > channel (IAX2). Guess you missed the part that this was a possibilty to pass CDR via IAX. Adding flexibility isn't tying to a specific transport. Hell going to a channel driver when you are a single install would not make it past this group of developers. -- critch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
