Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > So, is your proposal basically to move Asterisk as well to a linux > kernel 2.6 style kernel release cycle?
Yes, it would be a 2.6 release style for our development tree, as opposed to no development releases at all, and then having a year and a half of bugs to track down at once. I still want to maintain long life cycle release branches that are feature frozen, as well, like 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4, as I think there are a lot of people that like that. -- Russell Bryant Software Engineer Digium, Inc. _______________________________________________ Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! September 25-28th. http://www.astricon.net/ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
