Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:06:19AM -0600, Russell Bryant wrote: >> Eliel Sardanons wrote: >>> We could start a janitor for creating a 'foo reload' and we could make >>> de 'module reload *.so' do a module unload; module load >> I would rather not change the behavior of "module reload". I think that >> would >> be much worse than just removing it, as it changes behavior that has existed >> for >> years. Running "module unload / module load" isn't that bad. > > What's so bad about having some syntactic sugar? And actually having > some stable CLI between two releases? >
I don't think I understand what you're trying to imply here. Which part are you agreeing or disagreeing with? -- Russell Bryant Senior Software Engineer Open Source Team Lead Digium, Inc. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
