> On Jan. 8, 2014, 3:21 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote: > > Ship It!
Note: per Anthony Messina (issue reporter) -"It seems to me like it's ready to be pushed into branches/12." - Kevin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3094/#review10529 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 6, 2014, 12:49 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3094/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 6, 2014, 12:49 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Bugs: ASTERISK-22924 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-22924 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > Added in ability to specify display name format ("name" > <sip:name@ipaddr:port>) for a given URI and made sure it was fully propagated > to the outgoing message. This mainly occurred when sending to a direct URI > (using the default outbound endpoint). MESSAGEs sent to/from a valid > endpoint will use that endpoint's AOR/contact to fill in the appropriate > information. > > > Diffs > ----- > > branches/12/res/res_pjsip_messaging.c 404949 > branches/12/res/res_pjsip.c 404949 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3094/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Some manual testing and also ran the current testsuite tests that exists to > make sure everything still worked as expected. > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Harwell > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
