Thank you very much for the offer, but unless these would become the official packages, I don't think that would serve the purpose I'm trying to raise in this thread, which is to simplify the official community install method to a single repository. For my cases I can work around this complexity, and have done so, in my chef cookbook. That doesn't help people generally, though.
On 26 February 2014 10:48, Jared Smith <jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Ben Langfeld <b...@langfeld.me> wrote: > >> Unfortunately those packages are of Asterisk 1.8: >> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/asterisk.html. >> That's a total no-go for me, I'm afraid, but thanks for the suggestion :) >> > > Sure, the current EPEL packages themselves are stuck on Asterisk 1.8 (due > to EPEL policy of aiming for LTS releases of software and not upgrading > major versions), but the spec file is based on the Fedora package, which is > currently up to date with Asterisk 11. (As a side note -- Fedora hasn't > moved to Asterisk 12 because of some of the bundled library issues, > particularly around pjproject.) The spec file is at > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/asterisk/sources/spec/ and that > page also lists out the various subpackages that are built, patches that > are applied, etc. > > I could easily build Asterisk 11 RPMs based on the Fedora spec file for > RHEL/CentOS 6 if you're interested. > > -- > Jared Smith >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
