On 19 Mar 2014, at 11:34, Sean Bright <sean.bri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/19/2014 6:30 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >> The major one being that ICE was create so that we don't have to mess around >> like this. The external IP is just a server-reflexive address. You may want >> to make a decision on what you prefer in the C-line depending on the old >> logic - what's the most likely address we're going to end up with? > > With externaddr/externhost in chan_sip you are effectively hiding the fact > that Asterisk is behind a NAT device. Creating the ICE candidate list using > the local interfaces leaks information that you might not want getting > leaked. The goal of this patch was to make Asterisk appear to be sitting on > the public internet. I've been running it successfully for a few months, but > it's not ready for public consumption in it's current state. > That's a point. I've always been complaining to soft phone guys that the add a lot of useless ICE candidates from various strange interfaces on my OS/X created by Pararells, VMware and strange bridges I play with. I should be able to choose what to expose, as a long list affects call set up time. What you are going to miss is the ability to set up media in the best possible way with a local phone that still use STUN and use a server reflexive address in SIP. /O -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
