-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3447/#review11612
-----------------------------------------------------------


First off, I agree that anonymizing P-Asserted-Identity is not the correct way 
to be going here. The concept of trust is something that is not well-defined in 
chan_sip. The closest thing we currently have is the trustrpid option. When it 
is set, it means that we will actually use inbound 
Remote-Party-ID/P-Asserted-Identity headers as the identity of the entity that 
sent the SIP request/response to us.

In chan_pjsip, we have two trust-related options, trust_id_inbound and 
trust_id_outbound. trust_id_inbound is pretty much the same as chan_sip's 
trustrpid option. trust_id_outbound is a bit different. If set to yes, then we 
will send private identity information but include an indication that the 
information is private/restricted. In the case of P-Asserted-Identity, this 
means that the P-Asserted-Identity header is kept intact and a Privacy: id 
header is added. If trust_id_outbound is set to no, then we will send 
unrestricted identifying information, but anything marked as private/restricted 
does not get sent to the untrusted party at all.

Implementing an option similar to chan_pjsip's trust_id_outbound option is 
probably a good way to go. I think that it probably should default to 
off/false/no in all versions of Asterisk.

- Mark Michelson


On April 15, 2014, 4:52 p.m., Jonathan Rose wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3447/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 15, 2014, 4:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers, Joshua Colp, Matt Jordan, Mark 
> Michelson, and wdoekes.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AST-1301
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/AST-1301
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Walter Doekes pointed out that this might cause a less than ideal situation 
> in which people who were expecting P-Asserted-Identity not to disclose party 
> information will now be sending privacy information, so I pulled this patch 
> from 1.8-trunk and we will now review it here.
> 
> Without this patch, P-Asserted-Identity would always use anonymous for the 
> caller ID information, and RFC-3325 seems to indicate that 
> P-Asserted-Identity is something that should not be anonymized, but also only 
> sent to trusted parties. The way this was presented to me, the intent here is 
> that if you set callerpres to prohibited for a peer that receives 
> P-Asserted-Identity, the P-Asserted-Identity shouldn't be anonymized, only 
> the normal From/Contact headers would be anonymized. This apparently 
> 
> The obvious method for dealing with this mid-release change is to make the 
> change into an option which defaults off in 1.8-12 while defaulting on in 
> trunk. Also I'll need to add Upgrade notes for trunk since this might not 
> always be a desired behavior as well as CHANGES notes throughout to indicate 
> the new option if that's what we settle on.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/1.8/configs/sip.conf.sample 412331 
>   /branches/1.8/channels/chan_sip.c 412331 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3447/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Call from SIP peer A to SIP peer B
> settings for both peers:
> sendrpid = pai
> callerpres = prohib
> 
> 
> Invite sent from Asterisk to the recipient of the call
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Prior to patch:
> 
> Audio is at 19640
> Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to SDP
> Adding non-codec 0x1 (telephone-event) to SDP
> Reliably Transmitting (NAT) to 10.24.18.240:5060:
> INVITE sip:123@10.24.18.240:5060 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.24.18.246:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2fb42910;rport
> Max-Forwards: 70
> From: "Anonymous" <sip:anonymous@anonymous.invalid>;tag=as13075548
> To: <sip:123@10.24.18.240:5060>
> Contact: <sip:anonymous@10.24.18.246:5060>
> Call-ID: 762b8a5e5848d7997f38f71a770d4dd9@10.24.18.246:5060
> CSeq: 102 INVITE
> User-Agent: Asterisk PBX SVN-branch-1.8-r410380
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:59:39 GMT
> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, 
> PUBLISH
> Supported: replaces, timer
> P-Asserted-Identity: "Anonymous" <sip:anonymous@anonymous.invalid>
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 276
> 
> v=0
> o=root 473543868 473543868 IN IP4 10.24.18.246
> s=Asterisk PBX SVN-branch-1.8-r410380
> c=IN IP4 10.24.18.246
> t=0 0
> m=audio 19640 RTP/AVP 0 101
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-16
> a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
> a=ptime:20
> a=sendrecv
> 
> 
> After patch:
> 
> Audio is at 11822
> Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to SDP
> Adding non-codec 0x1 (telephone-event) to SDP
> Reliably Transmitting (NAT) to 10.24.18.240:5060:
> INVITE sip:123@10.24.18.240:5060 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.24.18.246:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5d4a7db8;rport
> Max-Forwards: 70
> From: "Anonymous" <sip:anonymous@anonymous.invalid>;tag=as181a14e3
> To: <sip:123@10.24.18.240:5060>
> Contact: <sip:anonymous@10.24.18.246:5060>
> Call-ID: 721bef28208f7633288e929c6e88824e@10.24.18.246:5060
> CSeq: 102 INVITE
> User-Agent: Asterisk PBX SVN-branch-1.8-r410380M
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:57:39 GMT
> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, 
> PUBLISH
> Supported: replaces, timer
> P-Asserted-Identity: "Goldy Locks" <sip:6018@10.24.18.246>
> Privacy: id
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 279
> 
> v=0
> o=root 1606369071 1606369071 IN IP4 10.24.18.246
> s=Asterisk PBX SVN-branch-1.8-r410380M
> c=IN IP4 10.24.18.246
> t=0 0
> m=audio 11822 RTP/AVP 0 101
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-16
> a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
> a=ptime:20
> a=sendrecv
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Rose
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to