----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3770/#review12618 -----------------------------------------------------------
/branches/12/rest-api/api-docs/recordings.json <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3770/#comment22900> While I'm not marking this as an issue I do wonder if "energy_duration" is too specific and technical for users of this. Would "speaking_duration" be better? Despite my question about the naming the code itself is good, if discussion indicates that energy_duration is fine then this can go in! - Joshua Colp On July 13, 2014, 10:21 p.m., Matt Jordan wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3770/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 13, 2014, 10:21 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers and Samuel Galarneau. > > > Bugs: ASTERISK-24037 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24037 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > This patch adds two new fields to the LiveRecording model, duration and > energy_duration. duration is the time, in seconds, of the entire recording as > reported by the Asterisk core; energy_duration is the time, in seconds, of > the recording minus any silence that was detected while recording took place. > > This is particularly useful when you want to throw away short recordings or > recordings that are all silence. > > Example RecordingFinished event: > > { > "application":"testsuite", > "type":"RecordingFinished", > "recording":{"state":"done", > "format":"wav", > "name":"superfly", > "duration":5, > "target_uri":"channel:1405289721.1", > "energy_duration":4 > } > } > > > Diffs > ----- > > /branches/12/rest-api/api-docs/recordings.json 418507 > /branches/12/res/res_stasis_recording.c 418507 > /branches/12/res/ari/ari_model_validators.c 418507 > /branches/12/res/ari/ari_model_validators.h 418507 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3770/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Testsuite tests will still need to be written for this feature. This will > review will be updated once a test has been written that verifies audio + > silence + audio along with expected durations. > > > Thanks, > > Matt Jordan > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
