-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3825/#review12746
-----------------------------------------------------------


The mechanics of the test are all good as far as I can tell.

However, given my comments from your Asterisk implementation review, the 
pjsip.conf will need to be updated to use a default outbound endpoint.

- Mark Michelson


On July 17, 2014, 9:51 p.m., Jonathan Rose wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3825/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 17, 2014, 9:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and Mark Michelson.
> 
> 
> Repository: testsuite
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3817/ adds the ability to send notify to 
> URIs with PJSIP endpoints while before it could only send to established 
> endpoints with registered aors/contacts.
> 
> This patch adds a test (thankfully I had already written a bunch that used 
> endpoints) to test that this is functional and includes the same sort of data 
> that would be included when sending these messages to endpoints. No peers are 
> defined in the configuration and some additional values are set in the 
> headers... something about lettuce. 
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/to_uri/test-config.yaml 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/to_uri/sipp/options.xml 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/to_uri/configs/ast1/pjsip.conf
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   /asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/ami/pjsip_notify/tests.yaml 5254 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3825/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran this test as well as all the existing notify tests to confirm that the 
> old tests weren't broken by the changes made in r3817.
> 
> Varied expectations of the SIPP scenario so that Romaine was just called 
> Roman (who has ever heard of Roman lettuce?) and received the expected 
> failure.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Rose
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to