-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4000/#review13356
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Mark Michelson


On Sept. 18, 2014, 6:26 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4000/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 18, 2014, 6:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AFS-162
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/AFS-162
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Outgoing PJSIP calls can result in non-negotiated formats listed in the 
> channel's native formats if video formats are listed in the endpoint's 
> configuration.  The resulting call could then use a non-negotiated format 
> resulting in one way audio.
> 
> * Simplified the update of session->req_caps in set_caps().  Why do something 
> in five steps when only one is needed?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/13/res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c 423446 
>   /branches/13/channels/chan_pjsip.c 423446 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4000/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Configured PJSIP endpoints with: allow=!all,h264,g722,h263,ulaw,h263p,alaw
> Called from D40 with g722 among other formats enabled to a Polycom that 
> negotiates ulaw.
> Before the patch, Asterisk would send g722 frames to the Polycom.  The 
> resulting call had one way audio because the Polycom does not understand g722.
> After the patch, Asterisk sends ulaw frames to the Polycom.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> rmudgett
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to