On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:08 PM, George Joseph <george.jos...@fairview5.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Samuel Galarneau <sgalarn...@digium.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 2 - we have a few options as far as team branches go. We could configure
>> user branches using refs/heads/team/${username}/* permissions in Gerrit to
>> allow users to create branches. This would prohibit other users from
>> pushing to a user branch, but they would still be visible. This would most
>> likely involve reproducing some sort of automerge/autorebase process. The
>> other option is to use github as another remote for team branches, with a
>> remote pointing to Gerrit for code reviews. Is there a preference between
>> these two approaches, or perhaps a better setup we could follow?
>>
>>
> I don't think there's any need for you to host users' repos any more. It
> may have made sense for SVN but I don't think it does for GIT. Let users
> make their own arrangements be it GitHub or in my case, my own GIT
> infrastructure.
>
>
+1. I don't think it makes sense with git. github or whatever should work
just fine for that purpose.
--
Russell Bryant
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
