> On Jan. 27, 2015, 9:01 p.m., Ashley Sanders wrote:
> > /branches/13/res/res_pjsip_outbound_registration.c, line 1543
> > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4381/diff/1/?file=71121#file71121line1543>
> >
> >     Since there are no other attributes being initialized, does this line 
> > need a comma?

The comma is there so if another member is initialized the comma doesn't need 
to be added later.  It is common practice in Asterisk.


- rmudgett


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4381/#review14328
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 27, 2015, 6:46 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4381/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 27, 2015, 6:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24729
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24729
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Performing a CLI "module reload" command when there are new pjsip.conf 
> registration objects defined frequently failed to load them correctly.  What 
> happens is a race condtion between res_pjsip pushing its reload into an 
> asynchronous task processor task and the thread that does the rest of the 
> reloads when it gets to reloading the res_pjsip_outbound_registration module.
> 
> * Made res_pjsip.c reload_module() use ast_sip_push_task_synchronous() 
> instead of ast_sip_push_task() to eliminate two threads processing config 
> reloads at the same time.
> 
> * Made get_registrations() not replace the global current_states container.  
> You could never add/remove objects in the container without the possibility 
> of the container being replaced out from under you by get_registrations().
> 
> * Added a registration loaded sorcery instance observer to purge any dead 
> registration objects.  The sorcery instance observer (struct 
> ast_sorcery_instance_observer) must be used because the callback happens 
> immediately during the load process.  The external observers callbacks 
> (struct ast_sorcery_observer) are pushed to a different thread.
> 
> * Added some global current_states NULL pointer checks in case the container 
> dissapears because of unload_module().
> 
> * Made sorcery's instance loaded observer callback (struct 
> ast_sorcery_instance_observer) guaranteed to be called before any external 
> observers (struct ast_sorcery_observer) will be called.
> 
> * Moved the check for non-reloadable objects to before the sorcery instance 
> loading callbacks happen to short circuit the attempt to reload 
> non-reloadable types earlier and so the non-reloadable type message can only 
> happens once for each non-reloadable type.  Previously the sorcery instance 
> loading/loaded callbacks would always happen, the individual wizard loading 
> would be prevented, and the non-reloadable type message would happen for each 
> associated wizard.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/13/res/res_pjsip_outbound_registration.c 431239 
>   /branches/13/res/res_pjsip.c 431239 
>   /branches/13/main/sorcery.c 431239 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4381/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually reloaded pjsip.conf with and without the registration type object 
> define.  Without the patch, CLI "pjsip show registrations" frequently showed 
> an empty list when there should have been an object displayed.  With the 
> patch it no longer fails to load.
> 
> The test_config, test_sorcery, and test_sorcery_astdb unit tests still pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> rmudgett
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to