On 03/30/2017 07:14 PM, Kevin Harwell wrote:
[asterisk-branch-number].[minor].[patch]
Actually, the proposal might be better represented as the following:
[asterisk-branch-number].[major].[minor/patch]
Or another way to state it:
[asterisk-branch-number].[api breaking].[api non breaking]
I think it's worth referencing a previous discussion on this [1]. I
agree with Mark's idea that having the ARI/AMI major version tied to the
Asterisk branch could lead to confusion, lead people to believe that ARI
14.3.0 == Asterisk 14.3.0.
[1] http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2016-November/075964.html
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
