I would agree with this. We have tried to deploy pjsip several times over the 
last year with limited success.
 We have had nothing but issues with database real-time deployments. Tables not 
working from one 13.x release to another.
 Table builders sorcery failing out.

 Issues when there are multiple transports on varying networks were udp is not 
routed correctly through the asterisk servers. No matter the settings.

 Connectivity issues with varying success by carrier.

 Unexplained audio quality issues that don't occur on the same spec running 
chan_sip

 We want to move to pjsip but the functionality and stability have only proven 
out for limited applications.


 Bryant


----------------------------------------
 From: "Daniel Journo" <d...@keshercommunications.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 8, 2017 3:12 PM
To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] One sip stack to rule them all....

> What is _also_ needed, however, is more use of PJSIP and reports of  specific 
> problems, and specific deficits of PJSIP so that the fear can be eased 
> before, at some point many years from now, chan_sip just doesn't work any 
> more.

There are a number of specific issues on issue tracker which still need 
addressing before more people will take it on properly. Some issues probably 
require a semi-major rethink and probably won't be dealt with for months.
Making chan_sip depreciated would leave Asterisk with no production grade sip 
stack that is officially being maintained.


-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to