I’m in favor of this approach as well.
On October 1, 2020 at 10:23:30 AM, Jared Smith (jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net)
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:04 AM Joshua C. Colp <jc...@sangoma.com> wrote:
Not really, and I think part of the problem is that this entire thing hasn't
really been documented, communicated, or been a strict part of the release or
development process. It's been more organic. Going forward it would be
explicitly part of the steps when cutting the new branch, for example, and part
of the announcement.
OK, thanks for the clarification. Consider me in favor of the process as you
outlined it, and also in favor of a more aggressive stance on deprecation of
modules that obviously aren't being heavily used/maintained.
-Jared
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
