On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:37 AM Henning Westerholt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > > > thanks for the update, the old patent phrase was indeed quite broad, > noticed that during review. This should capture the intent better. > > I understand that it needs re-signing. Does this also mean that the old > CLA is now voided for all organisations/people that signed it previously > from a contractual point of view? > No, it is not voided. > > > Just a suggestion, maybe it would be advantageous in case of future major > changes to the CLA to have a quick review session with the community > before, like on this list. Just as a chance to save the different involved > parties some time and effort. > I'll take this into consideration if it occurs. If there are ever concerns regarding the CLA as it stands, send me an email and I can loop in the appropriate party from Sangoma legal to discuss. -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Project Lead Sangoma Technologies Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
