On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 11:44, John Harragin wrote: > I am now seeing ~13 instances of *. I believe that prior to a cvs update > about 5 days ago (and again this morning) a single instance normally was > listed by ps. Is the a situation where this might this be normal (it is > possible that someone here changed the behavior of ps)? I don't think so, > each one of these tasks uses 7megs of ram...\
These are threads, the 7 megs each of them shows is the total for the whole process, not 7 meg per child. They're safe and a normal side effect of the design. I have 13 asterisk processes running currently. > This is a kind of slow machine. Maybe * is not reaping some startup tasks. > If I run top for a while only one of the jobs has used a significant > timeslice - so the others might be zombies. > > John Harragin > > This e-mail was scanned and found clean by Monroe-Woodbury CSD Antivirus. > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ryan Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ADI Internet Solutions _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
